Minnesota

  Intellectual Property Lawyers.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
July 20, 2010
Intellectual-Property
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Intellectual Property News

 

ITC Institutes Investigation On Certain Lighting Control Devices

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has voted to institute an investigation of certain lighting control devices including dimmer switches and/or switches. The products at issue in this investigation are devices for controlling light and its intensity.

The investigation is based on a complaint filed by Lutron Electronics Co. of Coopersburg, PA, on March 2, 2007. An amended complaint was filed on March 19, 2007. The amended complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation into the United States of certain lighting control devices including dimmer switches and/or switches that infringe patents owned by Lutron. The complainant requests that the ITC issue a permanent exclusion order and a permanent cease and desist order.

The ITC has identified Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc., of Little Neck, NY, and Control4 of Salt Lake City, UT, as the respondents in this investigation.

By instituting this investigation (337-TA-599), the ITC has not yet made any decision on the merits of the case. The case will be referred to the Honorable Robert L. Barton, an ITC administrative law judge, who will schedule and hold an evidentiary hearing. Judge Barton will make an initial determination as to whether there is a violation of section 337; that initial determination is subject to review by the Commission.

The ITC will make a final determination in the investigation at the earliest practicable time. Within 45 days after institution of the investigation, the ITC will set a target date for completing the investigation. ITC remedial orders in section 337 cases are effective when issued and become final 60 days after issuance unless disapproved for policy reasons by the U.S. Trade Representative within that 60-day period.

Contact our Minnesota Intellectual Property Lawyer Now!

 

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
The antitrust laws have improved over time.
Antitrust law and policy have dramatically improved since the 1970s.

 


  Newsroom  
 


News about Intellectual Property cases in Minnesota and nationwide:

U.S.- China hearing on Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights
The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission will conduct a public hearing on Wednesday, June 7, 2006 and Thursday, June 8, 2006 on China...
Read more >


Coordinator for International Intellectual Property Enforcement
Background

On July 22, 2005, President Bush announced the creation of a senior position to help combat intellectual property (IP) violatio...

Read more >


First Guilty Pleas by Members of Pre-Release Music Groups from Operation FastLink
WASHINGTON, D.C.— The first guilty pleas involving members of pre-release music piracy groups from Operation FastLink, a major Department of Justic...
Read more >


More Intellectual Property News >

 
 

Intellectual Property Terms

 


Today's Terms

Counterfeiting

Definition:
The act of producing or selling a product containing a sham mark that is an intentional and calculated reproduction of the genuine mark.

Assignee

Definition:
The entity that is the recipient of a transfer of a patent application, patent, trademark application or trademark registration from its owner of record.

Government records

Definition:
Derivative work is based on modified preexisting works to which the copyright owner has the exclusive rights to. The piece of work resulting from derivative work, considered as a whole may be separately copyrightable.

More Intellectual Property Terms >

 

Intellect. Property Resources

 


Search Intellectual Property resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Intellectual Property Hot Topics

 


Topics Related to Intellectual Property:

  • Copyright Issues
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Unfair Competition Concerns
  • Right of Publicity Questions
  • Confidentiality Agreement
  • Patent Corporation Treaty

More Intellectual Property Topics >

Minnesota Intellectual-Property Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Intellectual-Property attorney you should contact our Intellectual-Property Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Andover
  • Anoka
  • Austin
  • Bemidji
  • Brainerd
  • Burnsville
  • Circle Pines
  • Cottage Grove
  • Eden Prairie
  • Elk River
  • Faribault
  • Hastings
  • Lakeville
  • Mankato
  • Minneapolis
  • Moorhead
  • Osseo
  • Owatonna
  • Rochester
  • Saint Cloud
  • Saint Paul
  • Stillwater
  • Winona
s
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Minnesota Intellectual Property Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.